Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Projecting Power
Search
Search
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Sidanius Pratto 1999
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Some Basic Observations=== *All human societies systems of group-based hierarchies **Dominant groups have most power, subordinate groups have less **Dominant groups have a '''disproportionate share of positive social value''' ***Ex. group has the best homes, best access to education, best jobs, or seen as most physically attractive **Subordinate groups possess a '''disproportionate share of negative social value''' ***Ex. group has worse health outcomes, low homeownership, seen as less trustworthy (low social status), severe negative sanctions ====Group-Based Versus Individual-Based Social Hierarchies==== *'''Individual-based social hierarchy''': you receive power based on your own ability (ex. Your charisma, artistic skills, or specific other talents). *'''Group-based social hierarchy''': you receive power based on your ''membership in a prestigious group''. This is socially constructed. *Authors don’t mean individual traits don’t matter, just that some prestige is ascribed to group membership ====The Trimorphic Structure of Group-Based Social Hierarchy==== *Pierre van den Berghe’s three stratification systems: **'''Age system''': the older have power over the younger. Interesting in that people move through all levels of power in this system if they live full lives (identity flexible). **'''Gender system''': men have power over women (patriarchy). Authors conceptualized gender as fixed. **'''Arbitrary-set system''': structures of power based on other socially constructed identities ***Authors argue this system has a high degree of flexibility and “arbitrariness” because the identities are socially constructed and depend on context. **Argue that this system results in the most violence and oppression. **Argue that this system is not found within hunter-gatherer societies, unlike the other two systems (PD: I feel like there are some alternative explanations worth considering.). '''You need economic surplus to produce an arbitrary-set system. It will arise where economic conditions allow.''' *'''Every attempt to abolish an arbitrary-set system has failed.''' (PD: has any attempt to overthrow the other two types succeeded either?).
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Projecting Power may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Projecting Power:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Toggle limited content width