Editing Adida Robinson 2023

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
== Abstract ==
Main Idea:
The journal documents studies of Black immigrants selectively claiming the identity of US-born African Americans to protect against the racial discrimination of groups who have assimilated into American culture and the history of racism. This article follows the posed differences between black immigrants and US-born African Americans inferencing that there are incentives for one to separate oneself for economic reasons.
This study follows the assimilation of Black immigrants and analyzes the reasoning behind their decisions.


''' Claim '''
Main Argument:
The author argues that different immigrants face different likelihoods of
being racially lumped with members of the marginalized host community, and
therefore face different incentives to reify their ethnic identities as protection
from race-based discrimination. They look for factors that cause Black immigrants to resist assimilation. The themes of this study reinforce the intertwined importance of cultural identity and cultural change.


"The likelihood of being misidentified as a member of a marginalized
segment of the host population disincentivizes assimilation, while holding
constant the national identity, migration status, and religious identity of the
immigrant group" (Adida and Robinson 297). The author argues that different immigrants face different likelihoods of being racially lumped with members of the marginalized host community, and therefore face different incentives to reify their ethnic identities as protection from race-based discrimination. They look for factors that cause Black immigrants to resist assimilation. The themes of this study reinforce the intertwined importance of cultural identity and cultural change.


''' Themes '''


The journal documents studies of Black immigrants selectively claiming the identity of US-born African Americans to protect against the racial discrimination of groups who have assimilated into American culture and the history of racism. This article follows the posed differences between Black immigrants and US-born African Americans, inferencing that there are incentives for one to separate oneself to avoid race-based discrimination. This study follows the assimilation of Black immigrants and analyzes the reasoning behind their decisions.
== Methods ==


''' Assimilation '''
Assimilation:


The study uses 3 approaches to examine their argument:
* Qualitative Data
** A qualitative interview data from 1st and 2nd generation immigrants from sub-Saharan Africa to demonstrate that not all African immigrants are equally likely to be mistaken for African Americans. This highlights the complexities of Black immigrants' experiences. They found that Somali Bantus perceived themselves as facing race based discrimination.
* Experimental Evidence
** Conducted a lab to identify the demographic correlates of African immigrants being mistaken for African Americans. They found that Black immigrants from the Horn of Africa are less likely to be mistaken as African Americans than immigrants from different regions in Africa.
* Focus Group Discussions
** A focus group discussions and original survey data from Somali immigrants, between ethnic Somali and Bantus who have distinct features comparing the likelihood of being mistaken for African American. They found Bantus are more likely to be mistaken for African Americans than Somalis.


== Results ==
The study uses 3 empirical approaches to create their argument
 
qualitative interview data from 1st and 2nd generation immigrants from sub-Saharan Africa to demonstrate that not all African immigrants are equally likely to be mistaken for African Americans,
''' Findings '''
This shows the complexities of Black immigrants' experiences
 
A Lab experiment to identify the demographic correlates of African immigrants being mistaken for African Americans.  
The researchers ultimately found that the Somali Bantu migrants were more likely to be mistaken as African Americans, which caused them to resist assimilation. It showed in them "preferring ethnic names, or wearing national or ethnic-signaling attire, using their native languages in public, valuing ingroup over outgroup marriages, and choosing to live in particular neighborhoods — behaviors referred to elsewhere as “ethnic embeddedness”
Finding that Black immigrants from the Horn of Africa are less likely to be mistaken as African Americans than immigrants from different regions in Africa
(Waters et al., 2010) — all signal an identity separate from African Americans" (Adida and Robinson 302).
A focus group discussions and original survey data from Somali immigrants, between ethnic Somali and Bantus who have distinct features comparing the likelihood of being mistaken for African American
 
They found Bantus are more likely to be mistaken for African Americans than Somalis
Additionally, the researchers found that that ethnic Somalis were often mistaken for many other identities that expanded beyond Africa, such as being mistaken for Middle Eastern and Indian or mixed-race. This provided the researchers with the insight that ethnic Somalis have a wider range of potential identification classification assumptions in the U.S., as opposed to the ethnic Bantus, who do not share similar experiences. This provides crucial insight on the impact of stereotypes to migrants and their retaliation, or lack of, to assimilation.
 
''' Implications '''
 
The use of ethnicity as a 'buffer' against racial discrimination is very common among marginalized migrants. The researchers cited other studies on African and Asian migrants that found similar findings--migrants claimed their ethnicities over their perceived race in the US in order to distinguish themselves from marginalized groups in the US. While this is a tool that benefits migrants attempting to navigate the American racial class structure, it ultimately rests on the ultimate marginalization of African Americans.
Please note that all contributions to Projecting Power may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Projecting Power:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)