Editing King Smith 2005
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Key argument: racial orders thesis-American politics has been dominated by two competing orders (a set of White Supremacist orders and a set of transformative egalitarian orders). | Key argument: racial orders thesis-American politics has been dominated by two competing orders (a set of White Supremacist orders and a set of transformative egalitarian orders). | ||
Line 29: | Line 27: | ||
A political institution seeks to control individuals and institutions inside and outside bounds. | A political institution seeks to control individuals and institutions inside and outside bounds. | ||
Development- one predominant order gives way to another. | Development- one predominant order gives way to another. | ||
King and Smith argue that although there are distinct periods that allow the main institutions and initial formations of systemically racist formations to be traced through, the analysis of the existence of the organizations are not mutually exclusive from analysis of internal conflict of movements. | King and Smith argue that although there are distinct periods that allow the main institutions and initial formations of systemically racist formations to be traced through, the analysis of the existence of the organizations are not mutually exclusive from analysis of internal conflict of movements. | ||
Line 82: | Line 71: | ||
Conclusion | Conclusion | ||
The internal dynamic of American racial orders have is key to analyzing American power structures. | The internal dynamic of American racial orders have is key to analyzing American power structures. | ||