Editing Mares Young 2016
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
*3 factors lower the costs of economic intimidation in localities with high levels of concentration | *3 factors lower the costs of economic intimidation in localities with high levels of concentration | ||
**Owing to their scale, larger firms incur lower costs in carrying out political activities, such as control of electoral turnover or the distribution of political material on behalf of a particular candidate. | |||
**In concentrated localities, workers have fewer employment opportunities outside the firm. | **Owing to their scale, larger firms incur lower costs in carrying out political activities, such as control of electoral turnover or the distribution of political material on behalf of a particular candidate. | ||
**The concentration of employment in the hands of small members of actors reduces the possible coordination problems faced by employers in punishing workers with “dangerous” political views by denying them employment opportunities. | **In concentrated localities, workers have fewer employment opportunities outside the firm. | ||
**The concentration of employment in the hands of small members of actors reduces the possible coordination problems faced by employers in punishing workers with “dangerous” political views by denying them employment opportunities. | |||
*The willingness of employers to engage in electoral intimidation is also affected by labor market conditions such as labor scarcity | *The willingness of employers to engage in electoral intimidation is also affected by labor market conditions such as labor scarcity |