Editing Young Meiser 2007
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*Civil war was politically about whether the West would develop as a homogenous society predominately white, or if it would be biracial, where the slaves would be welcome. | *Civil war was politically about whether the West would develop as a homogenous society predominately white, or if it would be biracial, where the slaves would be welcome. | ||
Viewpoint 1: | Viewpoint 1: | ||
Line 15: | Line 13: | ||
*Generally accepting of King and Smith, **BUT** they believe an alternative approach better explains the role of race in the political and economic development of the United States from the Nation’s founding until the Civil War. | *Generally accepting of King and Smith, **BUT** they believe an alternative approach better explains the role of race in the political and economic development of the United States from the Nation’s founding until the Civil War. | ||
Reasoning: because the white racist supremacist order was dominant in all three regions of the nation, all the political conflicts that ultimately led to disunion and civil war took place almost entirely within the context of the single racial institutional order. | Reasoning: because the white racist supremacist order was dominant in all three regions of the nation, all the political conflicts that ultimately led to disunion and civil war took place almost entirely within the context of the single racial institutional order. | ||
*Young and Meiser see conceptualize antebellum American society as a plural society. “in which distinct social orders live side by side, but separately, within the same political unit.” | |||
The Anglo-American State maintained the stability of the American Plural Society. | |||
The | The state had to sustain its legitimacy through republican accountability to American citizens. | ||
State actors had to exercise brutal, coercive control over large groups of non-citizens to maintain slavery and promote the geographical expansion necessary for economic growth. | |||
*Because of this, Young and Meiser see the Antebellum American state as a dual state: “predatory” in dealing with non-whites, but a “contract state “concerning the internal governance of the dominant group, Anglo-American Males. | *Because of this, Young and Meiser see the Antebellum American state as a dual state: “predatory” in dealing with non-whites, but a “contract state “concerning the internal governance of the dominant group, Anglo-American Males. | ||
* | *This was an intentional action on the founder's part. It was to have two forms of capacity: the power of the contract state was its ability to shape American development, and the power was the coerce through dominant force. | ||
In summary, the duality ensured that Anglo-American society would do well because of the dispossession of native Americans and their land and the enslavement of African Americans. | In summary, the duality ensured that Anglo-American society would do well because of the dispossession of native Americans and their land and the enslavement of African Americans. | ||
Line 31: | Line 32: | ||
*Response: Looking at political entrepreneurs and the preexisting institutional orders as key independent variables gets rid of this issue. Do this by | *Response: Looking at political entrepreneurs and the preexisting institutional orders as key independent variables gets rid of this issue. Do this by | ||
1. Anglo-American political elites focused on economic growth on geographical expansion | 1. Anglo-American political elites focused on economic growth on geographical expansion | ||
2. During Jefferson and Jackson | 2. During Jefferson and Jackson, kept expanding westward | ||
3. | 3. Mexican War, changed the perspective of the West as a zero-sum game for farmers | ||
4. In the context of the federal system, | 4. In the context of the federal system, pressed on tensions of slavery and how it wouldn’t be possible to compromise. | ||
5. Lincolns' election | 5. Lincolns' election triggered Southern secession and civil war. | ||
The | The limitation of a Eurocentric World View | ||
King and Smith VP: American political scientists have historically not been more successful than America itself in addressing racial issues | King and Smith VP: American political scientists have historically not been more successful than America itself in addressing racial issues | ||
Line 101: | Line 102: | ||
*The federal political system, checks and balances, and a basic structure of property rights have encouraged the long-term contracting essential to creating capital markets and economic growth. | *The federal political system, checks and balances, and a basic structure of property rights have encouraged the long-term contracting essential to creating capital markets and economic growth. | ||
*Believes that the contract state and the predatory state are mutually exclusive categories, but Young and Meiser believe that the US was both a contract state and a predatory. | *Believes that the contract state and the predatory state are mutually exclusive categories, but Young and Meiser believe that the US was both a contract state and a predatory. | ||
*The Anglo-American State was | *The Anglo-American State was predatory, and it was the key means by which the new Anglo-American state demonstrated its effectiveness and gained legitimacy. | ||
*The founders intentionally designed the institutions to have two forms of capacity: low capacity regarding political interactions within the dominant governing group and high capacity for dealings with non-whites. | *The founders intentionally designed the institutions to have two forms of capacity: low capacity regarding political interactions within the dominant governing group and high capacity for dealings with non-whites. | ||
The | The power was established through | ||
1. The dominance of ideological power by state actors and their allies among the political elite | 1. The dominance of ideological power by state actors and their allies among the political elite | ||
2. the effectiveness of the new Anglo-American state | 2. the effectiveness of the new Anglo-American state | ||
The hard power of the predatory state was coercion through dominant force | The hard power of the predatory state was coercion through dominant force. |