Anderson 2006: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "Outline to come: * This is a bullet ** this is a sub-bullet *** this is a sub-bullet") |
No edit summary |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Introduction== | |||
* | *Nationality (nation-ness and nationalism) as a cultural artifacts | ||
** | *Need to understand | ||
*** | **How they have come into being | ||
**How the meaning has changed over time | |||
**Why they hold emotional legitimacy today | |||
'''Argument:''' the creation stems from the historical forces aligning, then became moveable, interactive socially, politically, and ideologically | |||
==Concepts and Definitions== | |||
Three paradoxes of nations/nationalism | |||
#Objective modernity of nations to historians vs. subjective antiquity to nationalists | |||
#Formal universality of nationality as a socio-cultural concept vs. its concrete manifestations | |||
#Political power of nationalisms vs. their lack of philosophy | |||
*'''Issue:''' nationalism often classified as an ideology (similar to kinship and religion) | |||
*'''Definition of Nation:''' an imagined political community, imagined as both inherently limited and sovereign | |||
**Imagined: members of a nation will never know most of their fellow members, but share communion. **Nationalism invents nations where they do not exist. | |||
**Limited: nations have finite (but elastic) boundaries | |||
**Sovereign: Enlightenment and Revolution destroyed legitimacy of the divine realm, created during religious **unrest and therefore symbolizes freedom | |||
**Community: nations hold horizontal comradeship | |||
==Cultural Roots== | |||
*Emblems of the modern culture of nationalism → tombs of Unknown Soldiers | |||
**Hold ghostly national imaginings, even though no one knows of their origins | |||
*Dawn of the age of nationalism, but dusk of religious modes of thought | |||
**Required a continuity with meaning | |||
**Nations were suited to fill in the void, because they loom out of the past and glide into the future | |||
**Does not suggest a causal relationship, but contextualizes the culture systems preceding it | |||
'''Three cultural conceptions that lost power:''' | |||
#Script-language offered privileged access to ontological truth | |||
#Society was naturally organized around/under high centers (like a monarch) | |||
#Cosmology and historical were indistinguishable, origins of man and the world were identical | |||
==Origins of National Consciousness== | |||
===Print Capitalism=== | |||
*Book-publishing services searched for markets, initially Europe (Latin) | |||
'''Expanded due to three reasons:''' | |||
#Change in Latin | |||
#Impact of the Reformation (really promoted the print market) | |||
#Slow and uneven spread of vernaculars as tools for administrative centralization (there was no systematic imposition of language) | |||
'''Print languages laid the groundwork for national consciousness in three ways:''' | |||
#Unified fields of exchange and communications through print and paper: allowed people to grow aware of their thousands of people in their language field, connected through print | |||
#Fixity to language: printed books kept a permanent form, were not unconsciously modernized | |||
#Languages of power: dominant languages in print gained power | |||
==Closure== | |||
In conclusion, Chapter 4 of Imagined Communities talks about the rise of Nationalism | |||
as a powerful concept in today's society along with the exploration of National | |||
Consciousness and how it was developed by several factors such as historical events | |||
and cultural norms. |
Latest revision as of 05:46, 6 May 2024
Introduction[edit]
- Nationality (nation-ness and nationalism) as a cultural artifacts
- Need to understand
- How they have come into being
- How the meaning has changed over time
- Why they hold emotional legitimacy today
Argument: the creation stems from the historical forces aligning, then became moveable, interactive socially, politically, and ideologically
Concepts and Definitions[edit]
Three paradoxes of nations/nationalism
- Objective modernity of nations to historians vs. subjective antiquity to nationalists
- Formal universality of nationality as a socio-cultural concept vs. its concrete manifestations
- Political power of nationalisms vs. their lack of philosophy
- Issue: nationalism often classified as an ideology (similar to kinship and religion)
- Definition of Nation: an imagined political community, imagined as both inherently limited and sovereign
- Imagined: members of a nation will never know most of their fellow members, but share communion. **Nationalism invents nations where they do not exist.
- Limited: nations have finite (but elastic) boundaries
- Sovereign: Enlightenment and Revolution destroyed legitimacy of the divine realm, created during religious **unrest and therefore symbolizes freedom
- Community: nations hold horizontal comradeship
Cultural Roots[edit]
- Emblems of the modern culture of nationalism → tombs of Unknown Soldiers
- Hold ghostly national imaginings, even though no one knows of their origins
- Dawn of the age of nationalism, but dusk of religious modes of thought
- Required a continuity with meaning
- Nations were suited to fill in the void, because they loom out of the past and glide into the future
- Does not suggest a causal relationship, but contextualizes the culture systems preceding it
Three cultural conceptions that lost power:
- Script-language offered privileged access to ontological truth
- Society was naturally organized around/under high centers (like a monarch)
- Cosmology and historical were indistinguishable, origins of man and the world were identical
Origins of National Consciousness[edit]
Print Capitalism[edit]
- Book-publishing services searched for markets, initially Europe (Latin)
Expanded due to three reasons:
- Change in Latin
- Impact of the Reformation (really promoted the print market)
- Slow and uneven spread of vernaculars as tools for administrative centralization (there was no systematic imposition of language)
Print languages laid the groundwork for national consciousness in three ways:
- Unified fields of exchange and communications through print and paper: allowed people to grow aware of their thousands of people in their language field, connected through print
- Fixity to language: printed books kept a permanent form, were not unconsciously modernized
- Languages of power: dominant languages in print gained power
Closure[edit]
In conclusion, Chapter 4 of Imagined Communities talks about the rise of Nationalism as a powerful concept in today's society along with the exploration of National Consciousness and how it was developed by several factors such as historical events and cultural norms.