Talk:Main Page: Difference between revisions
Add topic (→Week 3 Optional Reading: new section) |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Week 3 Optional Reading == | == Week 3 Optional Reading == | ||
Questioning "Ethnic Democracy": A Response to Sammy Smooha | |||
** "Ethnic Democracy" Model: a system which combines the extension of civil and political rights to individuals and some collective rights to minorities, with institutionalization of majority control over the state. | |||
Critiques | |||
* Israel as cannot be used as an "archetype" case of majority-minority relations due to the continuing "Judaization" of the country. | |||
** "Tyranny of the majority" that structurally prevents the Arabs from mobilizing effectively within this system and excludes them from key positions and resources. Therefore not an "archetype" of a democratic regime. | |||
Flaws in the "ethnic democracy" concept are: | |||
* civil inequality and lack of minority consent | |||
* ethnic exclusion | |||
* problems in the definition of state boundaries | |||
"Ethnic Democracy" and Civil Inequality | |||
* The Knesset: defines Israel as the state of the Jewish people | |||
** Israel is a "constitutionally exclusive ethnic state": accepting the state as a jewish state is an illusionary identity at best and a distorted identity at worst | |||
* Israel suppresses the mobility of the minority by the systematic exclusion of Arabs from key arenas of Israeli society. | |||
* Israel discriminates against Palestinian-Arab citizens on a daily basis and eliminates every possibility of upward mobility of the Arabs under Israeli rule. | |||
*Smooh's "ethnic democracy" can be seen as an oxymoron and a better term would be "ethnocracy" defined as a state that is appropriated by one ethnic group and its diasporas and relagates other groups to a secondary type of citizenship. | |||
*Ghanem concludes that Israel cannot be considered a democracy because of the ethnic discrimination despite having some characteristics of a democracy. |
Latest revision as of 04:13, 10 May 2024
Week 3 Optional Reading[edit]
Questioning "Ethnic Democracy": A Response to Sammy Smooha
- "Ethnic Democracy" Model: a system which combines the extension of civil and political rights to individuals and some collective rights to minorities, with institutionalization of majority control over the state.
Critiques
- Israel as cannot be used as an "archetype" case of majority-minority relations due to the continuing "Judaization" of the country.
- "Tyranny of the majority" that structurally prevents the Arabs from mobilizing effectively within this system and excludes them from key positions and resources. Therefore not an "archetype" of a democratic regime.
Flaws in the "ethnic democracy" concept are:
- civil inequality and lack of minority consent
- ethnic exclusion
- problems in the definition of state boundaries
"Ethnic Democracy" and Civil Inequality
- The Knesset: defines Israel as the state of the Jewish people
- Israel is a "constitutionally exclusive ethnic state": accepting the state as a jewish state is an illusionary identity at best and a distorted identity at worst
- Israel suppresses the mobility of the minority by the systematic exclusion of Arabs from key arenas of Israeli society.
- Israel discriminates against Palestinian-Arab citizens on a daily basis and eliminates every possibility of upward mobility of the Arabs under Israeli rule.
- Smooh's "ethnic democracy" can be seen as an oxymoron and a better term would be "ethnocracy" defined as a state that is appropriated by one ethnic group and its diasporas and relagates other groups to a secondary type of citizenship.
- Ghanem concludes that Israel cannot be considered a democracy because of the ethnic discrimination despite having some characteristics of a democracy.