Anderson 2006: Difference between revisions
Rzhang0326 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Rzhang0326 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
*'''Issue:''' nationalism often classified as an ideology (similar to kinship and religion) | *'''Issue:''' nationalism often classified as an ideology (similar to kinship and religion) | ||
*'''Definition of Nation:''' an imagined political community, imagined as both inherently limited and sovereign | *'''Definition of Nation:''' an imagined political community, imagined as both inherently limited and sovereign |
Revision as of 04:37, 16 April 2024
Introduction
- Nationality (nation-ness and nationalism) as a cultural artifacts
- Need to understand
- How they have come into being
- How the meaning has changed over time
- Why they hold emotional legitimacy today
Argument: the creation stems from the historical forces aligning, then became moveable, interactive socially, politically, and ideologically
Concepts and Definitions
Three paradoxes of nations/nationalism
- Objective modernity of nations to historians vs. subjective antiquity to nationalists
- Formal universality of nationality as a socio-cultural concept vs. its concrete manifestations
- Political power of nationalisms vs. their lack of philosophy
- Issue: nationalism often classified as an ideology (similar to kinship and religion)
- Definition of Nation: an imagined political community, imagined as both inherently limited and sovereign
- Imagined: members of a nation will never know most of their fellow members, but share communion. **Nationalism invents nations where they do not exist.
- Limited: nations have finite (but elastic) boundaries
- Sovereign: Enlightenment and Revolution destroyed legitimacy of the divine realm, created during religious **unrest and therefore symbolizes freedom
- Community: nations hold horizontal comradeship
Cultural Roots
- Emblems of the modern culture of nationalism → tombs of Unknown Soldiers
- Hold ghostly national imaginings, even though no one knows of their origins
- Dawn of the age of nationalism, but dusk of religious modes of thought
- Required a continuity with meaning
- Nations were suited to fill in the void, because they loom out of the past and glide into the future
- Does not suggest a causal relationship, but contextualizes the culture systems preceding it
Three cultural conceptions that lost power:
- Script-language offered privileged access to ontological truth
- Society was naturally organized around/under high centers (like a monarch)
- Cosmology and historical were indistinguishable, origins of man and the world were identical
Origins of National Consciousness
Print Capitalism
- Book-publishing services searched for markets, initially Europe (Latin)
Expanded due to three reasons:
- Change in Latin
- Impact of the Reformation (really promoted the print market)
- Slow and uneven spread of vernaculars as tools for administrative centralization (there was no systematic imposition of language)
Print languages laid the groundwork for national consciousness in three ways:
- Unified fields of exchange and communications through print and paper: allowed people to grow aware of their thousands of people in their language field, connected through print
- Fixity to language: printed books kept a permanent form, were not unconsciously modernized
- Languages of power: dominant languages in print gained power