Gamson Wolfsfeld 1993: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Abstract and Introduction == | == Abstract and Introduction == | ||
Abstract: | |||
- Offers organizing principles and hypothesis regarding the ways that social movements and new media affect outcomes for both parties | |||
Structural analysis: | |||
- Attention on power and dependency, consequences of asymmetries | |||
Cultural analysis: | |||
- More subtle or nuanced contest over meaning | |||
- Hypothesis on how social movement characteristics affect media coverage: | |||
a. Movement standing | |||
b. Preferred framing | |||
c. sympathy | |||
Main point: | |||
- Argue for the importance of organization, professionalism, strategic planning and for the benefit of division of power | |||
- Theorize on media characteristics and movements focus on leadership, action strategy, and framing strategy | |||
- Also argue for audience size | |||
a. Emphasis on visual | |||
b. Emphasis on entertainment values as influencing movements | |||
== Power and Dependency == | == Power and Dependency == | ||
Revision as of 01:08, 4 April 2024
Abstract and Introduction
Abstract: - Offers organizing principles and hypothesis regarding the ways that social movements and new media affect outcomes for both parties
Structural analysis: - Attention on power and dependency, consequences of asymmetries
Cultural analysis: - More subtle or nuanced contest over meaning
- Hypothesis on how social movement characteristics affect media coverage: a. Movement standing b. Preferred framing c. sympathy
Main point: - Argue for the importance of organization, professionalism, strategic planning and for the benefit of division of power - Theorize on media characteristics and movements focus on leadership, action strategy, and framing strategy - Also argue for audience size a. Emphasis on visual b. Emphasis on entertainment values as influencing movements