Stoddard 1997: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== "Bleeding Heart: Reflections On Using the Law to Make Social Change" == | == "Bleeding Heart: Reflections On Using the Law to Make Social Change" == | ||
Thesis: understanding the interrelationship between law and culture, and the use of law for social change | |||
*Goals of legal advocates for gay rights: | *Goals of legal advocates for gay rights: | ||
# Protection from discrimination | # Protection from discrimination | ||
# Freedom from intrusion and harassment | # Freedom from intrusion and harassment | ||
# Some degree of recognition of queer relationships | # Some degree of recognition of queer relationships | ||
*New York is culturally more tolerant of queerness, but legally offers no protections/recognition | |||
*New Zealand is culturally intolerant of queerness, but legally offers protections/recognition | |||
*Assumptions: | |||
#Society needs change, and there are people committed to that change | |||
#Employing the law to make change is appropriate | |||
=== The New Zealand Conundrum === | |||
*The 'conundrum': New Zealand is legally progressive with respect to queer protections, but is culturally conservative in this respect | |||
*social change and legal change do not always walk hand-in-hand | |||
**"one does not stimulate the other" | |||
=== A Paradigm of Reform === | |||
*Goals of lawmaking |
Revision as of 01:49, 19 April 2024
"Bleeding Heart: Reflections On Using the Law to Make Social Change"
Thesis: understanding the interrelationship between law and culture, and the use of law for social change
- Goals of legal advocates for gay rights:
- Protection from discrimination
- Freedom from intrusion and harassment
- Some degree of recognition of queer relationships
- New York is culturally more tolerant of queerness, but legally offers no protections/recognition
- New Zealand is culturally intolerant of queerness, but legally offers protections/recognition
- Assumptions:
- Society needs change, and there are people committed to that change
- Employing the law to make change is appropriate
The New Zealand Conundrum
- The 'conundrum': New Zealand is legally progressive with respect to queer protections, but is culturally conservative in this respect
- social change and legal change do not always walk hand-in-hand
- "one does not stimulate the other"
A Paradigm of Reform
- Goals of lawmaking