2025-03-11
Four comments on bcourses
Short and personal better than long and AI (but long is welcome!)
Why Eugenics?
Act of Killing
Dimensions of Race and Ethnicity
Europa, Europa
Some scholars insist that there was no direct American influence on Nazi race law
Others argue that America was the “classic example” of a country with racist legislation for the Nazis, but the idea of American influence on the Nuremberg Laws is “not just off-base, but plain wrong.”
The Nazis were interested in and admired a range of American practices, programs, and achievements in the early years of the regime.
The United States was regarded as the premier power in the world by interwar German racists.
Nazi lawyers gathered in June 1934 to plan the Nuremberg Laws, which were anti-Jewish legislation.
The meeting involved detailed discussions of American race law, with Justice Minister Gürtner presenting a memo on American race law.
The United States was regarded as the premier power in the world by interwar German racists.
The Nazis were impressed by the vigor of American industrial innovativeness and the vibrancy of Hollywood culture, though their taste for American culture was heavily qualified by their disgust for Jazz.
The Nazis frequently praised Franklin Roosevelt and New Deal government in the early 1930s
FDR received distinctly favorable treatment in the Nazi press until at least 1936 or 1937, lauded as a man who had seized “dictatorial powers” and embarked upon “bold experiments” in the spirit of the Führer
The New Deal depended heavily on the political support of the segregationist South
Nazi observers were particularly hopeful that they could “reach out the hand of friendship” to the United States on the basis of a shared commitment to white supremacy.
The Nazis had influence from America’s eugenics movement, and Nazis looked to the United States as a “model” for the program of ruthless eugenics that prefigured the Holocaust.
American eugenicists did not advocate mass euthanasia and their direct links with Nazis frayed at the end of the 1930s.
Eugenics was an international movement that extended beyond the borders of both the United States and Nazi Germany.
Nazi expansion eastward was accompanied by invocations of the American conquest of the West, with its accompanying wars on Native Americans.
The United States ranked alongside the British in Nazi eyes as racial kindred and builders of a great empire, both having undertaken epic programs of conquest.
The Nazis’ overwhelming concern lay in citizenship and sex/reproduction.
The Nazis found precedent and authority in American law, especially in American race-based lawmaking and anti-miscegenation laws.
The United States was a beacon of anti-miscegenation law with 30 different state regimes that were carefully studied, cataloged, and debated by Nazi lawyers.
American immigration and naturalization law conditioned entry into the United States on race-based tables of “national origins.”
The United States also created forms of second-class citizenship for blacks, Filipinos, Chinese, and others.
The Nazis found examples and precedents in the American legal race order that they valued highly while simultaneously deploring and puzzling over the strength of the liberal counter-current in a country with so much openly and unapologetically sanctioned racism.
The American impact on the rest of the world is not limited to what makes Americans proudest about their country, and it has also included aspects of the American past that we might prefer to forget.
“Michael D’Antonio, who wrote a biography of Trump in 2015, has credited Trump’s ‘racehorse theory’ — the idea adapted from horse breeding that good bloodlines produce superior offspring — to Mr. Trump’s father.”
“Trump has drawn widespread criticism for asserting that undocumented immigrants are ‘poisoning the blood of our country.’…The remarks have been criticized by historians, Jewish groups and liberals, who said his language recalled the ideology of eugenics…”
Study comparing Trump’s statements with “classic, influential writings by early twentieth-century eugenicists,” finds “Trump’s language and rhetoric are not innovative but heavily draw upon others’ ideas to evoke strong connections to America’s eugenic past.”
“Trump’s words regarding immigration, abortion policy, health, fitness, and religion, as well as other areas,” show “similarities to early advocates of eugenics and others who bemoaned race suicide.”
“Donald Trump’s Rhetoric and How Eugenics Frames His World,” by Shannon Bow O’Brien
Let’s hear from: Yana, Jessica, Arman, Tahira
Let’s hear from: Amy, Nicholas, Rithika, Alisa
Let’s hear from: Katie, Ava, Andy, Nadia
Let’s hear from: Lily, Pintack, Jazzy, Shasta
Let’s hear from: Tucker, Amelia, Ramona, Erika
Let’s hear from: Dillon, Lanah, Brynn, Gretchen
Let’s hear from: Luci, Praceda, Ariana, Stephanie
Institutions create incentives for associating or disassociating with a group
Individuals respond to those incentives
Time code: 00:04:38
Let’s hear from: Crystal, Patrick, Kierstyn, Danielle
:::
18:14
19:20
45:08
Let’s hear from: Alexander, Shah Bano, Harnoor, Diego
1:36:00
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/the-art-of-sound-design-in-the-oscar-nominated-film-the-zone-of-interest
54:21
54:30