Dolores, Why David
Sometimes Wins &
The Trouble with Unity
PS140O: Projecting Power
2024-02-13
Developing a “model” vocabulary
King & Smith: social orders, racial orders, two coalitions
Young & Mesier: predatory state and contract state (North), plural society (Furnivall & van den Berghe)
Why not discuss Israel?
Film in Week 3 was 12 Years a Slave
More generally, we’re interested in models more than any one case (e.g., Darden & Gryzmala-Busse)
On bcourses, two critiques of Smooha with alternate models
Will consider revisions for next year
Sidanius & Pratto do not dispute that coercion is a key part of how group-based hierarchy is maintained
However, coercion is not the only means of maintaining a stratified order
Legitimizing myths do a lot of work to maintain order
“Poetry is that, it’s that thing that reaches your heart. I always say, if you want people to change the way they act, change the way they think. You want to change the way they think, change the way they feel.”
— Kwame Alexander, NPR, 1/26/24
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshall_Ganz
Ganz entered Harvard in the fall of 1960
He left before graduating in 1964 to volunteer for the Freedom Summer project
In fall 1965 Ganz returned to California to work with Cesar Chavez to organize agricultural workers
Served in a variety of positions for the United Farm Workers of America
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshall_Ganz
Source: Ganz, Why David Sometimes Wins, Ch 2
Source: Ganz, Why David Sometimes Wins, Ch 2
“Growers integrated a system of labor contractors and crew bosses into an overarching network of centralized labor bureaus. By setting wages for almost every major crop and growing area in the state, the bureaus cut labor costs by 10–30 percent over the decade.”
“At the same time, the growers were organizing their firms, cooperatives, and associations horizontally by product—crop, region, and industry—and vertically by process: growing, packing, shipping, processing, and marketing.”
Source: Ganz, Why David Sometimes Wins, Ch 2
Source: Ganz, Why David Sometimes Wins, Ch 2
The strategic capacity of the UFW allowed it to rise above other organizations and be victorious as a social movement
“Students of strategy point to the UFW’s innovative redefinition of the arena of conflict, which linked farm workers to supporters through consumer boycotts.”
Source: Ganz, Why David Sometimes Wins, Ch 2
Source: Ganz, Why David Sometimes Wins, Ch 2
Source: Ganz, Why David Sometimes Wins, Ch 5
Framing of the message: rooted in religious, ethnic, and political culture and messaging rather than a traditional union.
Framed as a social movement toward civil rights rather than a struggle for better wages and working conditions.
To gain power, mobilize available resources including culture, religion, language and community ties
Agricultural Workers Organizing Committee (AWOC) rep insisted, “This is a trade union dispute, not a civil rights movement or a religious crusade.”
Ganz, Marshall. Why David Sometimes Wins, (p. 202)
Ganz, Marshall. Why David Sometimes Wins, (p. 203)
Ganz, Marshall. Why David Sometimes Wins, (p. 224)
Ganz, Marshall. Why David Sometimes Wins, p. 235-236
Ganz, Marshall. Why David Sometimes Wins, p. 235-236
© Matt Herron 1965
Let’s hear from: Rasheeda, Zainab, Anata, Tamara
Let’s hear from: Wyatt, Jonn, Tristan, Aissata
Let’s hear from: Karen, Wilfredo, Jordan, Layla
biography of saints or venerated persons
idealizing or idolizing biography